Understanding Karṇa and the Flawed Modern Victimisation
 | |
| Title | Understanding Karṇa and the Flawed Modern Victimisation |
|---|---|
| Author(s) | Raj Bijalwan |
| Platform | Bharatiya Jnana Sarita |
| Categories | Society & Culture/Laukikaśāstra & Śaikṣaṇika |
| Year | 2026 |
| Type of Article | Repurposed Advanced |
| Difficulty Level | Advanced |
| +-Summary |
|---|
Mahabharata encompasses tenets of jñāna and dharma. This repository of jñāna and dharma has often been subjected to modern interpretations… Mahabharata encompasses tenets of jñāna and dharma. This repository of jñāna and dharma has often been subjected to modern interpretations that ignore Bhāratīya social and cultural contexts. In modern interpretations, Karṇa has been constantly portrayed as a victim of social discrimination. The term 'sutaputra' has been presented as evidence for this. The article responds to the misleading interpretations and also presents the correct picture. The article draws upon evidence from the text of Mahābhārata to establish the correct picture. The article examines the roles and social structure prevalent in those days and thereby challenges the assumptions of modern interpretations. The article addresses the flawed victimisation of Karṇa and stresses on the need to base the understanding on Bhāratīya itihāsa.
|
Introduction
Bhāratīya itihāsa is an amalgamation of jñāna, śikṣā, preraṇā, cetanā, saṃskāra, and prabodhana. It is not static; rather, it continues to carry meaning for people across time. The itihāsa texts, such as the Mahābhārata and the Rāmāyaṇa, hold a sacred place because of their assertions on dharma. These texts hold sacred depth and vastness in themselves, which bring in lessons on moral life and humility. However, this vastness and depth has also brought along attempts of misindentification, and misinterpretation of facts.
Mahābhārata's timelessness is evident from the way it mirrors society at all times. As sources of jñāna and viveka, both Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa place dharma and its various dimensions at their core. Mahābhārata as the source of jñāna is depicted in the Gītā Dhyānam’s prayer to Vedavyāsa:
नमोऽस्तु ते व्यास विशालबुद्धे फुल्लारविन्दायतपत्रनेत्रे
येन त्वया भारततैलपूर्णः प्रज्वलितो ज्ञानमयः प्रदीपः ॥२॥ (गीता-ध्यानम्, श्लोक २) [1]
namo'stu te vyāsa viśālabuddhe
phullāravindāyatapatranetre
yena tvayā bhāratatailapūrṇaḥ
prajvalito jñānamayaḥ pradīpaḥ ॥2॥ (Gītā Dhyānam 2)
हम उन व्यास को नमन करते हैं जो विशाल बुद्धि से संपन्न है। उनके नेत्र कमल की पंखुड़ियों जैसे हैं। उन्होंने ही महाभारत रूपी तेल से ज्ञान के दीपक को भरकर प्रजवल्लित किया है।
Salutations to Vyāsa who has immense intellect, who has eyes like petals of a lotus flower, who has filled up the oil to the lamp of Mahābhārata, and kindled it as the lamp of knowledge. [1]
Bhāratīya itihāsa is not merely a corpus showcasing the past, it is a living embodiment of a civilisation, its jñāna and its cetanā. However, Bhāratīya itihāsa has encountered several attempts to misrepresent facts and alter the original accounts to further ideological orientations.
Several instances from the Mahābhārata and the Rāmāyaṇa have been subjected to doubts because of misunderstandings surrounding various concepts of Bhāratīya civilisation. Discussions about the Mahābhārata have often turned into debates about whether its characters were treated fairly. These debates have often relied on popular myths to conclude that Bhāratīya society treated people from different walks of life unfairly. Karṇa, for instance, has often been portrayed as a tragic hero, with his jāti being presented as the root cause of his suffering.
The tales of oppression pertaining to Karṇa have been used as an evidence to prove that ‘caste-based’ discrimination was practiced in the ancient times. Karṇa's ‘tragic hero’ notion originates from the word ‘sūta’, a word that has been misunderstood and maligned to suit perspectives.
Purpose and Scope
The article explores the alleged discrimination often associated with Karṇa. The notion regarding ‘caste’ arises from associating the word ‘sūta’ with caste. However, the word is often incorrectly identified with the concept of jāti. The article presents evidence from the Mahābhārata to correct the flawed glorification and idealisation of Karṇa. His portrayal as a victim is based on modern and colonial understandings that differ significantly from the Bhāratīya understanding of several of these concepts. The article aims to revisit the Mahābhārata to present a clear and conscious picture of concepts regarding varṇa, jāti or caste.
Pṛthā, later known as Kuntī, the daughter of Rājā Śūrasena, was brought up by Rājā Kuntibhoja. Following her devout service to Ṛṣi Durvāsā, Kuntī was blessed by him with a mantra that could invoke any devatā, who would then bless her with a son. Kunti could only use the mantra five times. Kuntī’s curiosity to test the power of the mantras at a young age led her to recite the mantra. She invoked Sūrya devatā, who appeared before her and blessed her with a son. Kuntī, fearing societal judgements, abandoned her son by setting him afloat on a river. The son was found by Adhiratha, who, along with his wife Rādhā, raised him as their own son [2]. The couple named the son as Vasuṣeṇa and he was later known as Karṇa.[3]
The Pāṇḍavas, Kauravas, Yādavas and Adhiratha shared a common forefather, Yayāti, who was a famous Candravaṃśī ruler. He was cursed with the onset of old age by his father-in-law, Śukrācārya. Later, Yayāti exchanged his old age with the youthfulness of his youngest son, Pūru and eventually realised that all the youthful happiness was futile and made no sense.
Tracing the Lineage
Yayāti married Devayānī, the daughter of Śukrācārya, a brāhmaṇa, and Śarmiṣṭhā, the daughter of Vṛṣaparvan, an asura king. In that way, Yayāti married a brāhmaṇa as well as a kṣatriya. Kauravas were born in the lineage of Yayāti and Śarmiṣṭhā. Even Adhiratha belonged to this lineage.
The Viṣṇu Purāṇa lists the lineage of Karṇa, describing him as belonging to Aṅga royal lineage. The fourth verse of chapter eighteenth, book four of the Viṣṇu Purāṇa records the genealogy of Adhiratha and Karṇa [4]. The Vāyu Purāṇa describes Karṇa’s entire genealogy as a member of the family of Aṅga Rājās and as the son of a charioteer [5].
A sūta was the child of a kṣatriya man married to a brāhmaṇa woman There are quite a few sūtas who became a part of the Mahābhārata which suggests that even a kṣatriya family had sūta descendants.
The beginning of Mahābhārata entails Sauti, also known as Ugraśravā Sauti, narrating the entire tale to the ṛṣis at Naimiśāraṇya. He was sūta paurāṇika, a traditional narrator of ancient stories, legends and genealogies. He was given an honored place among the assembly of sages, as he was widely respected by them. The Bhāgavata Purāṇa encompasses the story of sūta Romaharṣaṇa, the father of Ugraśravā, where he is given a higher seat than the ṛṣis because of his role as their paurāṇika.
The roles of paurāṇika assert that sūtas were famed storytellers who carried the responsibility of preserving and narrating legends along with dhārmika lessons and morals. Sūtas were skilled in chariot driving as well. Besides these roles, sūtas also held positions of power and the Mahābhārata explains this with several pieces of evidence, apart from Adhiratha and his lineage.
Sañjaya, who was Dhṛtarāṣṭra's trusted companion, was his charioteer as well. He narrated the events of the Kurukṣetra war to Rājā Dhṛtarāṣṭra. Likewise, Kīcaka, the commander of Virāṭa’s army, was often called Sūta-putra and was a powerful figure of the Matsya kingdom. In Mahābhārata, sūta are presented as charioteers, as commanders, as bards and also as counsellors, indicative of the positions occupied by sūtas in social and political domains.
In the modern times, the words ‘sūta’ and ‘sūtaputra’ have remained under scrutiny. But the verses from Mahābhārata portray the real picture. Being a son of the charioteer did not mean that the person belonged to the low status. It must not be forgotten that even the warrior princes were also trained in riding the chariot.
Mahābhārata presents several glaring evidences for the same. Arjuna, as Bṛhannalā, became the charioteer of Uttarakumāra when the prince was in need. Similarly, Uttarakumāra exchanged roles with Bṛhannalā when Arjuna chose to fight in place of the prince. Śrī Kṛṣṇa became Pārtha-Sārathī and even the proud Śalya accepted the role of Karṇa’s charioteer.
The Harivaṃśa purāṇa relates to Abhimanyu as the charioteer son of Subhadrā. In Mahābhārata’s Mārkaṇḍeya Samasyā Parva, Śrī Kṛṣṇa informs Draupadī about the training her sons were getting in Dvārakā. He mentions chariot driving, in addition to handling horses and using astra-śastra. All of this historical evidence simply points to the fact that being a charioteer did not deprive any person from being a royal and proves that Adhiratha held the position of a charioteer while also being an Aṅga royal.
There are several verses in Mahābhārata that help understand the essence of the word ‘sūta’. In Mahābhārata’s Vana Parva, Karṇa is addressed as ‘sūtaja’ by Duryodhana. Karṇa was Duryodhana’s best friend, his confidante and a trusted companion throughout his life. Therefore, there remains no reason for Duryodhana to address Karṇa with a derogatory term:
राजसूयं पाण्डवस्य दृष्टवा क्रतुवरं महत् ।
मम स्पृहा समुत्पन्ना तां सम्पादय सूतज । ।
(महाभारत, वनपर्व 3.256.6) [6]
rājasūyaṁ pāṇḍavasya dṛṣṭvā kratuvaraṁ mahat |
mama spṛhā samutpannā tāṁ sampādaya sūtaja, sūtanandana || (Mahābhārata, Vana Parva 3.256.6)
पाण्डव के उस महान् क्रतुश्रेष्ठ राजसूय यज्ञ को देखकर मेरे हृदय में भी वैसी ही अभिलाषा जाग उठी है। हे सूतपुत्र, हे सूतनन्दन! मेरी इस इच्छा को पूर्ण करो।[6]
Having beheld the great and foremost sacrifice, the Pāṇḍava’s Rājasūya, desire has arisen in my heart as well. O son of a sūta, O delight of the charioteer-clan, fulfill this wish of mine.[7]
Similarly, in the Sabhā Parva, it is Śakuni who refers to Karṇa, who was also known as Rādheya, a sūtaputra. These addresses to Karṇa, both by Śakuni and Duryodhana, are a part of a conversation. Both of them calling Karṇa as sūtaputra only adds to the point that the term had no relation to humiliation in any context :
द्रोणस्तव महेष्वासः सह पुत्रेण धीमता ।
सूतपुत्रश्च राधेयो गौतमश्च महारथः||
अहं च सह सोदर्यैः सौमदत्तिश्च वीर्यवान् ।
एतैस्त्वं सहितः सर्वैर्जय कृत्स्नां वसुंधराम् (महाभारत, सभापर्व २.४८.१०–११ ) [8,9]
droṇastava maheṣvāsaḥ saha putreṇa dhīmatā |
sūtaputraśca rādheyo gautamaśca mahārathaḥ ||
ahaṃ ca saha sodaryaiḥ saumadattiśca vīryavān |
etaistvaṃ sahitaḥ sarvairjaya kṛtsnāṃ vasuṃdharām (Mahābhārata, Sabhā Parva 2.48.10-11)
तुम्हारे महान् धनुर्धर द्रोण, अपने बुद्धिमान् पुत्र सहित; और सूतपुत्र राधेय; तथा महारथी गौतम और मैं अपने सहोदर भाइयों सहित, तथा वीर्यवान् सौमदत्त—इन सबके साथ होकर तुम समस्त वसुंधरा को जीत सकते हो।[8,9]
Droṇa, your great archer, together with his intelligent son; and Rādheya, the sūta’s son; and Gautama, the great chariot-warrior. And I too, together with my own brothers, and the valiant Saumadatti, supported by all these, you can conquer the entire earth.[10,11]
Even Rājā Dhṛtarāṣṭra addresses Karṇa as the one who brings joy to the sūta-kula, asserting Karṇa's qualities at the same time. While Dhṛtarāṣṭra praises Karṇa, there remains no reason to mock him simultaneously:
उपपन्नं महाप्राज्ञे कृतास्त्रे सूतनन्दने ।
त्वयि विक्रमसंपन्नमिदं वचनमीदृशम्|| (महाभारत, आदि पर्व १.१९४.२३ ) [12]
upapannaṃ mahāprājñe kṛtāstre sūtanandane |
tvayi vikramasaṃpannamidaṃ vacanamīdṛśam|| (Mahābhārata, Ādi Parva 1.194.23)
हे महाप्राज्ञ, अस्त्रविद्या में निपुण, सूतनन्दन! तुम जैसे पराक्रमसम्पन्न पुरुष के मुख से ऐसा वचन निकलना सर्वथा उपयुक्त है।[12]
Such a statement befits you,—O great-minded one, trained in weapons, son of the sūta,for you are endowed with valor. [13]
Sañjaya 's Address to Karṇa
Sañjaya, a sūta himself, addressed Karṇa as sūtaputra, while retelling the actions of Kurukṣetra to Dhṛtarāṣṭra:
परस्परं तौ विशिखैः सुतीक्ष्णैस्ततक्षतुः सूतपुत्रोऽर्जुनश्च । [14]
परस्परस्यान्तरेप्सू विमर्दे सुभीममभ्याययतुः प्रहृष्टौ || (महाभारत ,कर्ण पर्व ८.६५.१३ )
parasparaṃ tau viśikhaiḥ sutīkṣṇaistatakṣatuḥ sūtaputro'rjunaśca |
parasparasyāntarepsū vimarde subhīmamabhyāyayatuḥ prahṛṣṭau ||(Mahābhārata, Karṇa Parva 8.65.13 )
सूतपुत्र (कर्ण) और अर्जुन ने अत्यंत तीक्ष्ण बाणों से एक-दूसरे को घायल कर दिया। उस भयंकर संघर्ष में एक-दूसरे के छिद्र (कमजोरी) को खोजते हुए, वे दोनों हर्षित होकर भिड़ गए। [14]
The charioteer’s son and Arjuna struck at one another with very sharp arrows. Seeking an opening against each other in that close engagement, the two advanced with formidable intensity, exhilarated. [15]
Sañjaya gives an account of the fight between Arjuna and Karṇa and he calls Karṇa with the term ‘sūtaputra’. There is also an account in Mahābhārata when Sañjaya praises Karṇa for using Varunāstra for tackling the Āgneyāstra. Even then, Karṇa is termed sūtaputra. The address of sūtaputra by a sūta suggests that the term was not derogatory.
Referring to the fight between Bhīma and Karṇa, Sañjaya reasserts the latter’s sūta identity by calling him a sūtaputra to mark his lineage:
वध्यमानो महाराज सूतपुत्रेण पाण्डवः ।
न विव्यथे भीमसेनो भिद्यमान इवाचलः ||(महाभारत, द्रोण पर्व ७.११४.२) )[16]
vadhyamāno mahārāja sūtaputreṇa pāṇḍavaḥ |
na vivyathe bhīmaseno bhidyamāna ivācalaḥ || (Mahābhārata, Droṇa Parva 7.114.2 )
हे राजन्, सूतपुत्र द्वारा निरन्तर आहत होते हुए भी पाण्डव भीमसेन विचलित न हुआ—मानो आघातों से भी न डिगने वाला पर्वत। [16]
Though assailed by the sūta’s son, O king, the Pāṇḍava Bhīmasena did not waver, like a mountain that remains unmoved even when struck.[17]
Interestingly, there have been times when Sañjaya himself has called Karṇa as Adhiratha-putra interchangeably. This suggests that calling people with different descriptive names was common. In the Droṇa parva of Mahābhārata, Karṇa is called as Adhiratha-putra:
मरीचिविकचस्येव राजन्भानुमतो वपुः ।
आसीदाधिरथेर्घोरं वपुः शरशतार्चिषः || (महाभारत, द्रोण पर्व ७.११४.२१) [18]
marīcivikacasyeva rājanbhānumato vapuḥ |
āsīdādhiratherghoraṃ vapuḥ śaraśatārciṣaḥ || (Mahābhārata, Droṇa Parva 7.114.21)
राजन्, शत-शर-ज्वालाओं से दीप्त अधिरथपुत्र कर्ण का भयानक तेजस्वी स्वरूप, किरणों से प्रस्फुटित सूर्य के समान प्रतीत होता था। [18]
O King, the formidable presence of Adhiratha’s son (Karṇa) appeared like the radiant sun, as though blossoming in rays, brilliant with the flare of hundreds of arrows.[19]
Subtly, this also brings another fact into light: there was no reason for a sūta to call another with a term used for insulting, humiliating or demeaning others. In another instance from the Vana Parva of Mahābhārata, even Dhṛtarāṣṭra's calls Sañjaya as sūtaputra, furthering the assertion that the word ‘sūta-putra’ was not derogatory.:
रामकृष्णप्रणीतानां वृष्णीनां सूतनन्दन ।
न शक्यः सहितुं वेगः पर्वतैरपि संयुगे ॥७॥ (महाभारत, वन पर्व ३.५१.११ ) [20]
rāmakṛṣṇapraṇītānāṁ vṛṣṇīnāṁ sūtanandana |
na śakyaḥ sahituṁ vegaḥ sarvais tair api saṁyuge || (Mahābhārata, Vana Parva 3.51.11 )
हे सूतनन्दन! बलराम और श्रीकृष्ण के नेतृत्व से प्रेरित वृष्णिवंशियों के वेग को, युद्ध में वे सब (विरोधी) मिलकर भी सह नहीं सकते।[20]
O son of a charioteer, the onrush of the Vṛṣṇi warriors, set in motion and led by Balarāma and Kṛṣṇa, cannot be withstood in battle, even if all the opponents were to unite together.[21]
Connotations from Ṛṣi Vaiśampāyana
वैशंपायन उवाच ।
एवं पृष्ट्वा सूतपुत्रं हृच्छोकेनार्दितो भृशम् ।
जये निराशः पुत्राणां धृतराष्ट्रोऽपतत्क्षितौ||(महाभारत,द्रोण पर्व ७.९.१ ) [22]
vaiśaṃpāyana uvāca |
evaṃ pṛṣṭvā sūtaputraṃ hṛcchokenārdito bhṛśam |
jaye nirāśaḥ putrāṇāṃ dhṛtarāṣṭro'patatkṣitau || (Mahābhārata, Droṇa Parva 7.9.1 )
वैशंपायन बोले—इस प्रकार सारथि-पुत्र से पूछकर, हृदय-शोक से अत्यन्त पीड़ित और पुत्रों की विजय से निराश धृतराष्ट्र पृथ्वी पर गिर पड़े। [22]
Vaiśaṃpāyana said: Having thus questioned the charioteer’s son, Dhṛtarāṣṭra, sorely afflicted by grief in his heart and despairing of his sons’ victory, collapsed upon the earth.[23]
In the aforementioned śloka, Ṛṣi Vaiśampāyana calls Sañjaya as sūtaputra. His address has implied connotations arising from the terms ‘sūta’ and ‘sūtaputra’. Ṛṣi Vaiśampāyana’s call is a general address, indicating the normal way of conversation.
The addresses from Ṛṣi Vaiśampāyana, Sañjaya, Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Śakuni and Duryodhana are a reflection of how the word ‘sūta’ did not have negative connotations. As far as Karṇa is concerned, his lineage from Adhiratha’s side mentioned in the purāṇas, present a clear picture regarding his ancestry known in the society.
Conclusion
In Mahābhārata, several characters from diverse backgrounds find themselves occupying important positions. Yuyutsu, Dhṛtarāṣṭra's son by a Vaiśya maid, was on the side of Pāṇḍavas. When Parīkṣit is installed as Rājā and Yudhiṣṭhira decides to renounce the world, he entrusts Yuyutsu with the responsibility of administrating the affairs of the kingdom along with Kṛpācārya. Vidura was born to a woman of different social status but went on to occupy another important position in the Kuru kingdom. These examples are suggestive of the fact that people, irrespective of their lineage, held important positions in the kingdom. Therefore, the word sūtaputra or sūta occurs throughout the itihāsa as a symbol of the lineage or an identity in every context and has no relation to being a derogatory expression.
Mahābhārata brings socio-political, economical, cultural and historical domains of Bhāratavarṣa to light. The itihāsa grantha invalidates all efforts that misrepresent the facts related to the Bhāratīya society. The society evolved, but the jñāna that Mahābhārata holds continues to guide morally and socially. Despite distortions, jñāna has continued to reach the masses and satya has been understood through the itihāsa itself.
References:
Shlokam. (2026, July 28). Gita dhyanam. https://shlokam.org/shloka/gita-dhyanam.htm
www.wisdomlib.org. (2019, January 28). Story of Karṇa. https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/compilation/puranic-encyclopaedia/d/doc241687.html
Vedapath. (n.d.). Mahābhārata (Gita Press), Ādi Parva. https://vedapath.app/en/mahabharata-gita-press/adi-parva
www.wisdomlib.org. (2018, November 9). Lineage of Anu, the son of Yayati [Chapter XVIII]. https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/vishnu-purana-wilson/d/doc116015.html
Vāyu Purāṇa. PDF, Vedpuran.net, 2016. https://vedpuran.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/vayu-puran.pdf
Vedapath. (n.d.). Mahabharata (Gita Press), Vana Parva, Adhyaya 256, Shloka 6. https://vedapath.app/hi/mahabharata-gita-press/vana-parva/256/6
Vedapath. (n.d.). Mahabharata (Gita Press), Vana Parva, Adhyaya 256, Shloka 6. https://vedapath.app/en/mahabharata-gita-press/vana-parva/256/6
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Sabha Parva, Adhyaya 44, Shloka 10. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/hi/mahabharata-bori/sabha-parva/44/10
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Sabha Parva, Adhyaya 44, Shloka 11. Vedapath.
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Sabha Parva, Adhyaya 44, Shloka 10. Vedapath.
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Sabha Parva, Adhyaya 44, Shloka 11. Vedapath.
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Adi Parva, Adhyaya 194, Shloka 23. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/en/mahabharata-bori/adi-parva/194/23
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Adi Parva, Adhyaya 194, Shloka 23. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/en/mahabharata-bori/adi-parva/194/23
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Karṇa Parva, Adhyaya 65, Shloka 13. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/en/mahabharata-bori/Karṇa-parva/65/13
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Karṇa Parva, Adhyaya 65, Shloka 13. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/hi/mahabharata-bori/Karṇa-parva/65/13
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Drona Parva, Adhyaya 114, Shloka 2. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/en/mahabharata-bori/drona-parva/114/2
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Drona Parva, Adhyaya 114, Shloka 2. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/hi/mahabharata-bori/drona-parva/114/2
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Drona Parva, Adhyaya 114, Shloka 21. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/hi/mahabharata-bori/drona-parva/114/21
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Drona Parva, Adhyaya 114, Shloka 21. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/en/mahabharata-bori/drona-parva/114/21
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Vana Parva, Adhyaya 51, Shloka 11. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/en/mahabharata-gita-press/vana-parva/51/11
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Vana Parva, Adhyaya 51, Shloka 11. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/hi/mahabharata-gita-press/vana-parva/51/11
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Drona Parva, Adhyaya 9, Shloka 1. Vedapath. https://vedapath.app/hi/mahabharata-bori/drona-parva/9/1
Vyasa. (n.d.). Mahabharata, Drona Parva, Adhyaya 9, Shloka 1. Vedapath.
Original Article Information
- Original Article Link: https://www.brhat.in/dhiti/suta-adhiratha-impoverished-charioteer-or-anga-royal
- Original Article Details: Sūta Adhiratha, Karṇa's foster father, is often depicted as a poor, frail man on the lowest rung of social hierarchy, oppressed for his ‘caste’. What is the truth?