Editing Ethical Frameworks from Indian Philosophies (section)

==== '''The Distinction Between Morality and Legality''' ====
Indeed, while laws are subject to change and can be amended to reflect evolving societal norms and values, they are not the ultimate dictum on moral behaviour. There is a profound distinction between 'morality' and 'legality'. A legal action might not necessarily be moral; conversely, something moral might not always be legal. Indian moral ethos and philosophy predominantly focus on morality rather than legality. This distinction is crucial in understanding the depth and breadth of Indian philosophical thought. Indian philosophy often delves into the nuances of ethical conduct, encouraging individuals to reflect on the moral implications of their actions beyond their legal permissibility. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of ethical behaviour that transcends mere compliance with laws, emphasizing a more introspective and principled way of living.

There are many examples of something being legally permissible but morally corrupt. Legal perspectives often work on the severity of the act rather than the immoral nature of the same. For instance, one might not be punished for a small theft, but that does not make the act morally acceptable. Hence, one can understand that the law cannot be the perfect source for deciding what is right and wrong.